Especially in this day when they’ve all gotten really good. I don’t sell software, and it’s not my place to try to convince you to use one program over another. This article was written for someone who is looking for a Lightroom replacement. Tools that you’ve probably spent a lot of time, energy, and money learning – and they’re not going away anytime soon. The grass is not necessarily greener, and you’ve got some good and really amazing editing tools at your disposal. You get a very fair price for two very powerful pieces of software. If you’re a happy Lightroom/Photoshop user, then simply be happy with what you’re using. So I don’t think it’s as important to pick a photo editor based on how good their sliders are.

We look as we drag, and we can figure it out by looking at the photo. Even if, -2.5 Exposure doesn’t look exactly the same, most of us don’t edit off of the numbers. But for me, the Exposure slider in one program is the same as the Exposure slider in the other program. Sure, there may be small nuances that the more refined eye can pick up between one editor and another. What I mean by that is that the sliders we use pretty much all work the same. I believe that photo editing has become (mostly) commoditized. But there was one really important statement I made that sets up this article: My main goal in the article was just to get people to simplify. It was all about where we are with photo editing these days. And I think one of the most important things to first get a handle on it is from an article I wrote last year. “Can (insert program name here) be a replacement for Lightroom/Photoshop?”Īfter copy/pasting the same response at least 100 times, I figured it was time to write something on it. Lately, my customer support inbox, social media, and just about every public-facing place I have is filled with the same question over and over again.

Import apple photos to lightroom